We can agree to the revised payment schedule provided that the first instalment is received by 30 June.
我们可以同意修改后的付款计划,条件是首期款项在6月30日前收到。
Please confirm the delivery date by Friday, failing which we will have to source the materials elsewhere.
请在周五前确认交货日期,否则我们将不得不从别处采购材料。
常见错误
✗ We can agree the revised payment schedule, provided that the first instalment will be received by 30 June. → ✓ We can agree to the revised payment schedule provided that the first instalment is received by 30 June.
We would appreciate it if you could provide a response by early next week.
如能在下周初前回复,我们将不胜感激。
I must insist that the outstanding balance be cleared no later than 15 July.
我必须坚持您在7月15日前结清欠款。
常见错误
✗ I must insist that the outstanding balance is cleared by 15 July. → ✓ I must insist that the outstanding balance be cleared by 15 July.
insist that后的从句在正式语体中常用虚拟语气(be),而非直陈语气。
↑ 提分:恰到好处的礼貌施压比生硬命令更能维护合作关系,同时不失威严,是高阶写作者的标志。
阅读 Reading terms
Supplier Terms: Negotiation Points
This document outlines the key negotiation points arising from the draft supply agreement between Greenway Ltd and Brunt & Co. The following items require clarification or amendment before we can proceed to signature.
Delivery and Penalties: The draft stipulates deliveries within 14 working days. We propose an amendment to 10 working days, provided that an express surcharge is applied for urgent orders. Failing this, a penalty of 2% per week of delay shall apply, with a cap at 8% of the total order value.
Payment Terms: The current provision requires payment within 30 days. We seek an extension to 45 days for orders exceeding £50,000. In return, we offer a 2% early settlement discount for invoices paid within 15 days.
Liability Cap: Brunt & Co. seeks to cap their liability at the contract value. We consider this inadequate for consequential losses. As a compromise, we suggest a cap of 150% of contract value, subject to a specific exclusion for gross negligence.
Dispute Resolution: The agreement currently provides for arbitration in London. We request that mediation be attempted first, and that the seat of arbitration be changed to a neutral and mutually convenient location, failing which the matter should be referred to the English courts.
We trust you will give these points your favourable consideration and look forward to receiving your response by 20th June.
TFNG1.Greenway Ltd accepts the original delivery timeframe without changes.
✅ FALSE — 文中说We propose an amendment to 10 working days,表明他们要求修改。
MCQ2.What penalty does Greenway Ltd propose for late delivery?
A 2% per week with a cap at 8%
B 8% of the total order value per week
C 2% of the total order value
✅ A — 文中a penalty of 2% per week of delay shall apply, with a cap at 8% of the total order value。
gap_fill3.For large orders, Greenway Ltd wants payment to be made within ___ days.
✅ 45 — We seek an extension to 45 days for orders exceeding £50,000。
matching4.Match the issue with the proposed amendment: Liability Cap
✅ Cap at 150% of contract value, excluding gross negligence — 文中提到a cap of 150% of contract value, subject to a specific exclusion for gross negligence。
MCQ5.What is Greenway's position on dispute resolution?
A They insist on arbitration in London
B They want mediation first and a neutral arbitration location
C They prefer court proceedings immediately
✅ B — request that mediation be attempted first, and that the seat of arbitration be changed to a neutral location。
💡 技巧:商务条款阅读要抓取提议、条件和后果的精确表述,关注provided that / failing which / subject to 等逻辑词,能快速定位让步和限制。
听力 Listening Section 1 · US
情景:客户致电保险公司协商保费费率,提出增加司机但要求不涨保费太多。
Agent
Good morning, Statewide Insurance, this is Jeremy. How can I help?
Mrs. Keller
Hi, I'm calling about my auto policy. I need to add my son as a named driver, but I'm hoping we can work out a fair rate.
Agent
Certainly, I can help with that. Adding a young driver usually increases the premium significantly, but let's see what we can do. What's his age and driving experience?
Mrs. Keller
He's 19, and he's had his licence for a year. No accidents or tickets, though.
Agent
Okay. Normally the annual increase would be around $800. But if you agree to a higher deductible—say $1,000 instead of $500—that could reduce the increase to about $500.
Mrs. Keller
Hmm, a $1,000 deductible feels a bit high. What if we keep the deductible at $500 but I agree to have my son take a defensive driving course?
Agent
That would certainly help. Completion of an approved course gives a 10% discount on the driver's portion. That might bring the increase down to around $620.
Mrs. Keller
That sounds more reasonable. Could we also look at bundling my home insurance? Maybe that would offset some of the cost.
Agent
Absolutely, bundling gives you a multi-policy discount of up to 15%. With both the course and the bundle, I can get your total increase down to about $400 per year.
Mrs. Keller
Okay, let's go with that then—assuming that's the final figure and there won't be any surprise fees.
Agent
I understand. That is indeed the final figure, subject to underwriting approval. I'll send you the revised quote by email. You'll need to confirm within 10 days, failing which the quote expires.
MCQ1.What is Mrs. Keller's main concern?
A adding a new car
B increasing her deductible
C keeping the premium increase manageable
✅ C — 她多次协商意在降低因添加年轻司机带来的保费上涨。
gap_fill2.The agent initially proposes raising the deductible to $___.
✅ 1000 — say $1,000 instead of $500。
gap_fill3.If her son completes a defensive driving course, the increase would be around $___.
✅ 620 — might bring the increase down to around $620。
MCQ4.How much is the final annual increase after all discounts?
A $400
B $500
C $620
✅ A — With both the course and the bundle, I can get your total increase down to about $400 per year。
You recently placed an order for office supplies from a new supplier. However, the delivery was incomplete and some items were damaged. Write a letter to the supplier. In your letter: • explain what you ordered and what went wrong • suggest what you want them to do • say what you will do if the problem is not resolved to your satisfaction
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing regarding order #8821 placed with your company on 5 June for a range of office supplies. While the first part of the delivery arrived on schedule, several issues have arisen which require your immediate attention.
Specifically, the consignment was short of two filing cabinets and a box of printer paper, all clearly itemised on the packing slip. Furthermore, upon inspection, the desk lamp we received has a cracked base and is unusable. I must, therefore, request that the missing items be dispatched within five working days, and that a replacement lamp be sent at no additional cost. I would appreciate it if you could confirm the delivery date by return.
I trust you will understand that this falls short of the standard of service we expect. Should the matter remain unresolved by 30 June, I will have no option but to cancel the order and seek a full refund, failing which I shall refer the matter to our trade association.
I look forward to your prompt confirmation and a swift resolution.
Yours faithfully,
Janice Woolford
逐句标注
任务“I am writing regarding order #8821 placed with your company on 5 June”开篇明确订单信息,满足任务第一个要点。
语法“I must, therefore, request that the missing items be dispatched within five working days”利用must情态动词表达坚定需求,虚拟语气be dispatched体现正式文书风格。
词汇“I would appreciate it if you could confirm the delivery date by return.”礼貌施压典型句式,既客气又明确对方义务。
衔接“Should the matter remain unresolved by 30 June, I will have no option but to cancel the order”使用倒装条件句Should...,比If more formal,符合正式信函衔接。
语法“failing which I shall refer the matter to our trade association.”本课语法点failing which带出后果,显示掌控力和法律意识。
Q: How often do you need to negotiate in your daily life?
Not every day, but occasionally. Whether it's discussing a contract with a service provider or even just deciding where to go for dinner with friends, a bit of back-and-forth is pretty common, I'd say. I actually quite enjoy it when it's done in good faith.
💡 用back-and-forth地道表达,并带出in good faith词块,展现词汇面。
Q: What skills do you think are important in a negotiation?
Obviously, clarity about your own needs, but more importantly, the ability to see the other side's position and find common ground. I think patience and emotional control are underrated—negotiations can get tense, and losing your cool rarely helps.
💡 common ground, underrated, losing your cool均为自然口语搭配,观点有层次。
Part 2 · 提示卡
Describe a time when you successfully negotiated something. You should say: • what the situation was • who you negotiated with • what you agreed on • and explain why you felt it was successful.
A negotiation that comes to mind happened just last year when I was trying to resolve a billing issue with my internet provider. I'd been overcharged for three consecutive months, and every time I called, I seemed to get a different story. Finally, I requested to speak to a supervisor. I laid out the evidence calmly: the bills, the promotional offer I'd signed up under, and the dates I'd been charged incorrectly. I think what helped was that I didn't just complain—I proposed a specific solution: I asked them to refund the overcharged amount and, as a gesture of goodwill, to extend my promotional rate for an extra six months. To my surprise, the supervisor agreed without much pushback. I felt it was successful because we both walked away satisfied: I got a fair outcome, and they kept a loyal customer. That taught me that being prepared with facts and staying reasonable can turn a complaint into a win-win.
Q: Do you think formal negotiation skills can be taught, or are they innate?
I'd say a bit of both, but the balance tips heavily towards learned skills. Sure, some people are naturally more persuasive, but the core techniques—active listening, framing proposals, knowing when to walk away—can all be systematically taught and practised. That's why so many companies invest in negotiation training. Admittedly, experience and instinct play a role, but they're built on a foundation of technique.
💡 论述平衡,使用核心词persuasive, framing proposals, walk away, 结构清晰。
Q: In business, when might a strong legal threat be appropriate in a negotiation?
That's a delicate question. In principle, threats should be a last resort because they can poison the relationship. But in cases where one party is clearly in breach, and all diplomatic avenues have failed, it may be necessary to explicitly mention the option of legal action—preferably framed as 'we would be compelled to consider our legal options' rather than as a blunt threat. It's about signalling seriousness without humiliation. And even then, it's usually better for both sides to try mediation first, because litigation rarely makes anyone truly happy.
💡 回答有分寸感,使用delicate question, poison the relationship, blunt threat, signalling seriousness等高阶词汇,最后收束到mediation,逻辑严谨。