The overuse of disposable products contributes significantly to environmental waste.
一次性产品的过度使用极大地加剧了环境浪费。
landfilln.B2
垃圾填埋场
be sent to landfill · landfill sites
Thousands of tons of waste end up in landfill every day.
每天有数千吨垃圾最终进入填埋场。
sustainableadj.B2
可持续的
sustainable development · sustainable practices
We must shift towards more sustainable production and consumption patterns.
我们必须转向更可持续的生产与消费模式。
biodegradableadj.C1
可生物降解的
biodegradable materials · biodegradable packaging
Unlike plastic, paper is biodegradable and does not persist in the environment.
与塑料不同,纸张可生物降解,不会在环境中持久残留。
emissionn.B2
排放
carbon emissions · greenhouse gas emissions
The waste sector accounts for a significant share of global methane emissions.
废弃物部门在全球甲烷排放中占有很大份额。
recyclingn.B1
回收利用
recycling facilities · recycling rates
Improving recycling rates is essential to reduce the burden on landfills.
提高回收率对于减轻填埋场的负担至关重要。
wasten.B1
废物;浪费
household waste · reduce waste
The average household produces over a ton of waste each year.
平均每个家庭每年产生超过一吨的垃圾。
consumptionn.B2
消费;消耗
overconsumption · consumption patterns
Rising consumption has placed enormous pressure on natural resources.
不断增长的消费给自然资源带来了巨大压力。
packagingn.B1
包装
excessive packaging · food packaging
Many consumers are now demanding less packaging on their purchases.
许多消费者现在要求购买的商品减少包装。
shortagen.B2
短缺
resource shortages · water shortage
Unchecked consumption could lead to severe resource shortages.
不加节制的消费可能导致严重的资源短缺。
degradev.C1
降解;退化
take ... to degrade · degrade naturally
It can take centuries for a plastic bottle to degrade.
一个塑料瓶可能需要几个世纪才能降解。
pollutev.B1
污染
pollute the environment · pollute waterways
Industrial discharge continues to pollute our rivers.
工业排放物继续污染着我们的河流。
reusableadj.B2
可重复使用的
reusable bags · reusable containers
Switching to reusable shopping bags is a simple but effective step.
改用可重复使用的购物袋是简单但有效的一步。
discardv.C1
丢弃
discard ... carelessly · discard old electronics
We must learn to repair and reuse rather than simply discard.
我们必须学会维修和再利用,而不是简单地丢弃。
扩展词库 expansion
depletionn.C1
消耗;枯竭
resource depletion
e-wasten.C1
电子废弃物
the rising tide of e-waste
lifecyclen.C1
生命周期
product lifecycle
incinerationn.C1
焚烧
waste incineration
compostingn.C1
堆肥
home composting
consumerismn.C1
消费主义
rampant consumerism
throwawayadj.C1
一次性使用的;用完即弃的
throwaway society
overconsumptionn.C1
过度消费
the problem of overconsumption
downcyclingn.C1
降级回收
downcycling of plastics
upcyclingn.C1
升级再造
upcycling old materials
single-useadj.B2
一次性的
single-use plastics
bio-wasten.C1
生物废料
separate bio-waste
microplasticsn.C1
微塑料
microplastics in the ocean
extractionn.C1
开采;提取
resource extraction
recyclableadj.B2
可回收的
recyclable materials
littern.B2
乱扔的垃圾
drop litter
pollutantn.C1
污染物
release pollutants
circularityn.C1
循环性
the principle of circularity
wastefulnessn.C1
浪费
the wastefulness of modern life
dumpingn.B2
倾倒(垃圾)
illegal dumping
词块 / 生存短语 chunks
throw away扔掉
We throw away too much food that is still edible.
我们扔掉了太多仍可食用的食物。
end up in最终进入(某处)
Millions of plastic bags end up in the ocean each year.
每年有数百万个塑料袋最终进入海洋。
a vicious cycle恶性循环
Overconsumption creates a vicious cycle of waste and resource depletion.
过度消费造成了浪费和资源枯竭的恶性循环。
the tip of the iceberg冰山一角
Visible litter is just the tip of the iceberg; the real problem is production.
可见的垃圾只是冰山一角;真正的问题在于生产。
take a toll on对…造成损害
Our throwaway culture is taking a toll on the planet.
我们的丢弃文化正在对地球造成损害。
in the long run从长远来看
Reducing waste now will benefit us in the long run.
现在减少浪费从长远来看将使我们受益。
go to waste被浪费掉
All that careful planning went to waste because of one mistake.
因为一个错误,所有精心计划都白费了。
reduce, reuse, recycle减量、再利用、回收(环保三原则)
The mantra 'reduce, reuse, recycle' is still the cornerstone of waste management.
「减量、再利用、回收」这一口号仍然是废物管理的基石。
语法 语言升级点
Impersonal passive structures with 'it'C1
使论证更客观、更具普遍性,避免直接提及自己或特定人群,常用于学术写作和正式表达。
It + passive verb + that clause (e.g., It is often argued that...; It is widely believed that...)
在议论文中,使用 'It is thought/said/believed/argued that...' 可以引出普遍观点或对方立场,使语气更加中立、有距离感。例如,'It is often assumed that more consumption equals more happiness' 比 'Many people assume that...' 更加客观。注意从句中的动词时态要与主句一致。
例句
It is widely accepted that our current levels of waste are unsustainable.
人们普遍认为我们目前的废物水平是不可持续的。
It has been argued that imposing a tax on single-use plastics would change consumer behaviour.
有人认为对一次性塑料征税会改变消费者行为。
常见错误
✗ It is believed that the government must takes action. → ✓ It is believed that the government must take action.
that 从句中的动词形式要与情态动词或主语一致,这里应为 take,而非 takes。
↑ 提分:8.5档会将这种结构与 namedropping 结合(如 'It has been estimated by the UN that...'),或者替换为名词短语('There is a widespread belief that...'),进一步丰富表达。
Nominalisation for textual cohesionC1
避免重复前句,使行文更加紧凑、正式,增强逻辑连贯性。
使用名词或名词短语(this shift, such a development, the consequence)指代前文提及的观点或情况,实现句子间衔接。
在论证中,前一句说明某种现象或观点后,下一句常以名词化的方式概括并承接。例如,前句说 'People are throwing away more food than ever before.',下一句可以用 'This wastefulness has serious environmental consequences.' 从而避免原句重复,并自然引出后果。这类名词化结构特别适合7.5分以上的衔接,因为不是生硬地堆砌 however/furthermore。
例句
Production has become centralised and globalised. This shift has reduced costs but increased the carbon footprint of goods.
生产已经变得集中化和全球化。这一转变降低了成本,但增加了商品的碳足迹。
In many countries, recycling rates remain low. Such a trend reflects a lack of both infrastructure and public awareness.
在许多国家,回收率仍然很低。这一趋势反映出基础设施和公众意识的缺乏。
常见错误
✗ People buy more than they need. This is a big problem. → ✓ People buy more than they need. This overconsumption places a strain on resources.
用 this is a big problem 太笼统,缺乏名词化带来的具体所指和正式感。应该用一个名词(overconsumption)来概括前句的行为。
↑ 提分:8.5档会在名词化基础上加入同位语或定语从句,如 'This reliance, which shows little sign of abating, ...' 使句式更加复杂且自然。
阅读 Reading general interest
The True Price of a Bargain
Walk into almost any high-street shop today and you are confronted by an endless stream of low-priced goods. Clothes, electronics, household items—all available at prices that would have seemed unimaginably low a generation ago. The consumer, it seems, has never had it so good. Yet behind these bargains lies a cost that is rarely displayed on the price tag: an environmental one.
The modern economy runs on what is often termed a linear model. Resources are extracted, turned into products, used, and then discarded. This 'take-make-dispose' system has delivered material comfort on an extraordinary scale, but it generates staggering amounts of waste. A recent report noted that the world produces over two billion tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, and that figure is projected to rise sharply in the coming decades.
Much of the waste problem stems from the culture of disposability that has taken hold. From single-use coffee cups to fast fashion, items are designed for short lifespans and quick replacement. Manufacturers have little incentive to make products that last, because repeat purchases drive profits. The result is that a significant proportion of what we buy ends up in landfill or incinerators within a year.
What is to be done? Some argue that the solution lies in tighter regulation—compelling companies to design for repairability and recyclability, or taxing the use of virgin materials. Others believe that the real change must come from consumers themselves, who can vote with their wallets by choosing more durable goods and reducing unnecessary purchases. In truth, a combination of both approaches is likely to be needed. As one waste reduction campaigner put it, 'We need to stop treating the planet like a disposable commodity.'
municipal solid waste城市固体废物staggering惊人的,令人震惊的virgin materials原始材料,未使用的原材料
TFNG1.The linear economic model has brought material comfort but also creates huge amounts of waste.
✅ TRUE — 文章明确指出:This 'take-make-dispose' system has delivered material comfort ... but it generates staggering amounts of waste.
MCQ2.According to the passage, why do manufacturers not design long-lasting products?
A Because consumers prefer cheap items
B Because repeat purchases are more profitable
C Because environmental laws are too strict
✅ B — 文中提到:Manufacturers have little incentive to make products that last, because repeat purchases drive profits.
gap_fill3.The world produces over ___ billion tonnes of municipal solid waste each year.
✅ two / 2 — 直接信息,文中是 over two billion tonnes。
matching4.Match the proposed solution to its supporter: 'Consumers choosing durable goods' is advocated by ___.
✅ those who believe change should come from consumers themselves — 文中:Others believe that the real change must come from consumers themselves, who can vote with their wallets by choosing more durable goods...
💡 技巧:GT阅读需要注意作者如何引入话题并呈现对立观点。这篇文章先描述现象,再分析原因,最后提出建议。注意连接词(yet, however, in truth)和引用语,它们通常标志着观点转折和作者的真实态度。
听力 Listening Section 2 · UK
情景:环保官员在社区中心介绍减少食物浪费的倡议(Section 2 独白)
Officer
Good evening, everyone, and thank you for coming. Tonight I want to talk about a problem that affects every household—food waste. In the UK alone, we throw away nearly seven million tonnes of food every year, most of which could have been eaten. That's not just a waste of money; it's also terrible for the environment.
Officer
The good news is that small changes can make a big difference. First, try planning your meals for the week. When you shop without a list, you're far more likely to buy things you don't need. Second, store your food properly. A surprising amount goes off simply because it's kept at the wrong temperature. And finally, get creative with leftovers—there are hundreds of recipes online for turning last night's dinner into today's lunch.
Officer
The council is also launching a new scheme next month. We'll be providing every household with a small kitchen caddy for food scraps. These will be collected weekly and turned into compost, which will then be used in local parks. It's a simple system, but we're confident it can cut the amount of food going to landfill by a third.
Officer
Now, I'm sure many of you are wondering about cost. The caddies are free, and the collection will be integrated into your existing waste service, so there won't be any extra charge. We're also running a series of free workshops on how to reduce food waste at home—the first one is next Tuesday at the town hall.
gap_fill1.In the UK, about ___ million tonnes of food are wasted annually.
✅ seven / 7 — 官员开头即说:we throw away nearly seven million tonnes of food every year。
MCQ2.According to the speaker, what is one reason food goes off?
A poor planning
B wrong storage temperature
C leftover recipes
✅ B — 提到:A surprising amount goes off simply because it's kept at the wrong temperature。
MCQ3.What will the council provide to each household?
A a free workshop place
B a kitchen caddy
C a meal planner
✅ B — providing every household with a small kitchen caddy for food scraps。
gap_fill4.The collected scraps will be turned into ___ and used in local parks.
In many countries, people produce a large amount of household waste. Some think that the government should introduce strict laws to reduce this waste, while others believe that it is an individual's duty. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The sheer volume of waste generated by modern households has sparked a debate about where responsibility lies. While some argue that government intervention is essential, others contend that the onus should fall on individuals. In my view, a joint effort is required, but the state must take the lead.
Those who call for strict legislation point to the scale of the crisis. Landfills are nearing capacity, and plastic pollution is choking marine ecosystems. From this perspective, it is argued that only binding rules—such as bans on single-use plastics or mandatory recycling schemes—can bring about rapid change. Without such measures, voluntary action is likely to remain piecemeal and ineffective.
On the other hand, critics of state interference maintain that waste is fundamentally a matter of personal discipline. They believe that if individuals become more mindful of their consumption—choosing reusable items, composting, and avoiding over-packaged goods—the problem would shrink organically. Moreover, they fear that regulations could erode freedom of choice and prove costly to implement.
In my opinion, both sides have merit, but relying solely on personal responsibility is unrealistic. Environmental damage is a collective problem: one person’s decision to recycle makes little difference unless multiplied across millions. Government action—through incentives, public education and, where necessary, restrictions—creates the framework within which individual efforts can thrive. In the long term, this dual approach is the most promising.
To conclude, while personal habits are important, the urgency of the waste crisis demands that governments take the initiative. Only by combining top-down policies with bottom-up commitment can we hope to stem the tide of waste.
逐句标注
语法“it is argued that only binding rules ... can bring about rapid change”使用本课语法点 impersonal passive (it is argued) 引出观点,并嵌入强调性 only 结构。
词汇“Landfills are nearing capacity, and plastic pollution is choking marine ecosystems.”词汇精准且形象(nearing capacity, choking),符合 C1 档。
衔接“this dual approach”本课语法点 nominalisation for cohesion,用名词短语指代前段论述的两种方法,自然衔接。
语法“government action—through incentives, public education and, where necessary, restrictions—”长句中的插入说明,逗号和破折号使用准确,体现语法灵活性。
任务“relying solely on personal responsibility is unrealistic”立场清晰,直接点明个人责任单独作用的不现实性,为后文论证政府主导做了铺垫。
🎯 本档语言特征:本文立场明确且平衡,论证有层次;名词化(urgency, commitment)、被动 impersonal structure 自然运用;词汇精准(piecemeal, stem the tide, organic);衔接靠内在逻辑而非机械路标词。整体达到 band 8 水平。
Absolutely. I've made a conscious effort over the last couple of years. I avoid single-use plastics whenever possible, I separate my recycling, and I've started composting food scraps. It's not always convenient, but I think it's the least we can do.
💡 用具体例子展开回答,conscious effort 和 the least we can do 为地道短语。
Q: What do you think about the amount of packaging used today?
To be honest, I find it excessive and quite frustrating. You buy a small item, and it comes wrapped in layers of plastic and cardboard. It feels like such a waste, especially when you know much of it can't be recycled. I wish retailers would take more responsibility.
💡 使用 hedging (to be honest, I find it...) 和情感词 (frustrating) 让回答自然;结尾表达愿望,展现语言能力。
Part 2 · 提示卡
Describe a product that you think produces a lot of waste when it is made or used.
You should say:
- what the product is
- how it is typically made or used
- why it generates so much waste
- and explain whether anything could be done to reduce that waste.
I'd like to talk about disposable coffee cups—the kind you get from most high-street coffee chains. They seem convenient, but they're actually a very wasteful product. They're made from paper, but to make them waterproof, they're lined with a thin layer of plastic, which makes recycling extremely difficult. In most places, they can’t be processed by standard recycling facilities, so the vast majority end up in landfill or are incinerated.
The waste is not just in the cup itself; it's also in the lids and the little stirring sticks, which are often also single-use plastic. Multiply that by the billions of cups used globally each year, and you can see the scale of the problem.
To reduce this waste, many coffee shops now offer discounts if you bring your own reusable cup. Some cities have even introduced a 'latte levy'—a small charge on disposable cups—to encourage behaviour change. I think both of these are steps in the right direction, but real progress would require the industry to develop truly recyclable or compostable alternatives.
I think it often comes down to a mix of inconvenience and a lack of awareness. In some areas, recycling systems are quite complicated—you have to separate different materials and clean them—and for a busy household, that can feel like too much effort. On top of that, many people don't really see the direct impact of their actions; the link between putting a bottle in the right bin and cleaner oceans feels very abstract. So, without a strong personal reason, recycling can get pushed down the list of priorities.
💡 分析原因时使用 hedging (often, I think),并给出两点原因,用 come down to, on top of that 自然衔接。
Q: What role should manufacturers play in reducing waste?
A huge one, in my opinion. They're at the very beginning of the supply chain, so they have enormous power to design out waste. For instance, they can choose materials that are easier to recycle, reduce unnecessary packaging, or even shift to a model where they take back and refurbish old products. I think voluntary action hasn't worked well, so governments might need to set minimum standards, but the real redesign has to come from the manufacturers themselves.
💡 使用强调(a huge one)、习语(design out waste),并提出具体措施,观点清晰。